1 · It is a process, not a rule

The buying and the burning are done by a program running on one computer. They are not enforced by the network and there is no contract compelling them. If that machine is switched off, loses power or loses its internet connection, the claiming stops, the buying stops and the burning stops, and nothing on-chain notices or objects.

What is guaranteed is narrower and worth stating exactly: every burn that has already happened is permanent and public, and the supply figure is a number anybody can read off the chain. The history cannot be faked or reversed. The future is a promise about a process, and you should price it as one.

2 · The fee authority is a key, held by a person

Creator fees are claimable by whoever holds the creator's key. That key exists, somebody holds it, and there is no technical mechanism preventing them from claiming the fees and doing something else with them, or from stopping. The reason to believe otherwise is not cryptography, it is the public record of what the wallet has actually done, transaction by transaction, which is linked from the front page.

The wallet the fees land in does one job and nothing else. It is not the wallet the coin was created from and it is not used to trade. If it is ever seen doing anything other than claiming, buying and burning, that is a real problem and you should treat it as one.

3 · It buys high, by construction

The money it spends is a share of the trading volume, and volume is highest when the price is highest. So the machine always has the most to spend at exactly the least useful moment, and the least to spend when the coin is cheap. This is not a flaw that could be tuned out, it is the shape of the input.

Measured on the launch this engine came from: its two largest buys were 50.7% of everything it ever spent, and both executed at the two highest prices of the coin's life. The same money spread evenly across the same moments would have bought 21.8% more. A fixed lot size flattens this a little, because a hot market no longer swells the size of each buy. It does not remove it. Nothing here times anything and nothing here claims to.

4 · No volume means no burning at all

There is no other income. When trading slows the fees shrink, the gaps between lots stretch out, and below one lot's worth nothing fires at all. A coin nobody is trading is a coin whose supply stops moving. The page will show that honestly, with the count sitting where it was, rather than filling the silence with something.

5 · Burning supply is not a floor and it is not demand

Destroying tokens reduces how many exist. It does not put money into the pool, it does not create a price anybody has to pay, and it does not oblige anybody to buy. A smaller supply with no buyers is worth exactly as little as a large supply with no buyers.

The buying that does happen is real and it does land in the market, but it is small and it is bounded by the fees, which are a fraction of a percent of volume. Do not model this as support. There is no mechanism here that redeems anything, guarantees anything, or pays anybody out.

6 · The buy can fail, and sometimes will

Each lot is a real transaction against a live route, and the price can move between the moment it is quoted and the moment it lands. When it moves too far the transaction reverts. On the launch this engine came from, 2 of 8 buys reverted that way after every one of them had simulated cleanly, and a quarter of all attempts failed without anything on the page saying so.

Two things follow. A reverted buy costs the fee and destroys nothing, so the count simply does not move that cycle. And a run of them is now surfaced rather than smoothed over: the engine tracks both a consecutive-failure count and a failure rate, and the ledger's footer on the front page reads FAILING when either trips. If you see that, believe it.

7 · A part lot sits unspent

The claim is divided into whole lots, so whatever is left over waits in the wallet for the next fee to join it. At any moment there can be up to one lot short of 0.05 SOL sitting there doing nothing, and at the very end of the coin's life that residue simply stays there. It is bounded, it is small, and it is stated here rather than quietly rounded away.

8 · What has and has not been tested

Proven against a real chain, on devnet, before launch: the burn under both SPL token programs with the supply read back off the mint rather than taken from the code's word; that the buy and the burn are genuinely atomic, demonstrated by making the burn fail and confirming the SOL never moved; a full run of lots fired back to back; the books reconciling against a live balance across a kill and a restart; and a deliberate corruption showing that the conservation check can actually fail.

Not proven, and not provable before launch: pump.fun has no devnet deployment, so the creator-fee claim itself has never run anywhere but mainnet. Neither has the real swap route or real slippage, because a fake price cannot move between the quote and the block. The first live cycle is the first time those have ever run. That is the honest state of it.

9 · It is a coin, and it can go to zero

This is a memecoin on pump.fun with a buyback bolted to its fee stream. It is not an investment, there is no team, no roadmap and no promise of any kind. Most coins like this are worth nothing within hours and this one is not exempt from that. Nothing on this site is financial advice or an instruction to buy anything.